Posted by: Don Linnen | 31 August 2007

Three Seconds After the Snap

It’s amazing what we’re trying to do now. At least what some are trying to do.

Today’s college football quarterbacks need to take a football snapped from the center, drop back a few steps, look over about a hundred square yards of grass, and decide what to do with the ball. They have about three seconds to make up their mind and execute the plan…or improvise….or get crunched. That’s a lot quicker than 10 years ago.

Heck, I’m from Texas. I have trouble saying a simple sentence in three seconds. Don’t even ask me to put “philanthropy” in that sentence.

College teams all over the country are spending big bucks for simulators from companies like Gridiron Technologies or Visual Edge to get their qb’s into a better place mentally to make quicker decisions. The Air Force Academy allegedly has their football players jumping on trampolines and reading two eye charts, one inches from their face and one 10 yards away.

Is this a trend for social capital in the 21st Century??? Wikipedia describes social capital as the “advantage created by a person’s location in a structure of relationships.”

College football is all about having an advantage in the relationships on the field. The game is faster than ever. There are more options than ever. The relationships are more complex than ever. The costs are higher, and there’s more money at stake than ever before.

This holds true for the rest of life as well. Relationships are the common denominator. What you do to maintain healthy relationships and prepare for change in a rapidly changing world is vital.

Sure hope my bifocals stay on when I’m on the trampoline.

Posted by: Don Linnen | 21 August 2007

Diversity is Dead!

Posted by: Don Linnen | 7 August 2007

The Battle at Kruger

Okay kids. It’s a battle for survival. Who you gonna place your bet on? Your choices are a lion, a crocodile, a water buffalo. Actually, lets make it a baby water buffalo…a calf.

If you’ve not seen this video, it IS amazing. Don’t read any further if you want to sustain the suspense of the ending. It’s on YouTube 24×7 and national tv tonight. Joe Bob says check out the Battle at Kruger. Background to the video is on the ABC news site.

If you don’t have eight minutes to watch this, then bookmark it for later. It’s a fast and fascinating video. Rated PG13. Some violence, very little blood, but heavy child endangement.

If you’re an animal lover, you’ll start with heart in throat and end with a grin. The least among them wins! It’s not the stealthiest (or sneakiest). It’s not the fastest and flashiest. It’s the humble water buffalo who prevails.

And why did they win? Because the herd worked together (and showed a lot of courage). Funny how this paceline thing of working together to succeed keeps popping up in the world.

Do our bovine buddies have something to teach us more advanced animals? Do you think ANY of our politicians get it??

Lets hope our nonprofits get it when they’re trying to save those that are the least among us.

Posted by: Don Linnen | 29 July 2007

Parallels

This year’s Tour de France ended today. Camp Esperanza ended yesterday.

The Tour de France is a 100+ year old bike race across Europe. Camp Esperanza is a 25 year old summer camp for kids fighting cancer in Texas.

Le Tour is 21 teams of 9 vying for fame and glory (and considerable monetary rewards) by racing bicycles across Europe to get to Paris first. Camp Esperanza is 10 teams of 6 volunteer counselors working with 10 groups of about 14 children ranging in age from 6 to 16. All the kids are or have been fighting cancer at Children’s Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.

The Tour lasts for nearly three weeks and covers over 2000 miles of beautiful European countryside. Camp Esperanza lasts for one week at the Camp John Marc facility on the border of the beautiful Texas Hill Country near Meridian, Texas.

Both have sophisticated support staffs and spend many months planning each year’s event. (Camp John Marc is probably one of the premier camps for medically fragile children in the world.)

What amazes my simple mind are the remarkable parallels between these two radically different adventures. It gets back to working together. The guys on the bikes can go fast and help each other by riding in pacelines. (See my blog of July 10, 2007.) The same goes for the men and women working with the nearly 140 kids who epitomize diversity.

Three busloads of children arrive on Sunday and depart for home the following Friday. The kids range from future linebackers to some who are near the need for (or are actually in) hospice.

For some of the children, it is the first time they’ve been away from home. For some of their parents, it is the first time they’ve let go of their children since they’ve been diagnosed with cancer. For nearly everyone, it is the best week of the year.

It is an exhilarating, exhausting, challenging, fun, sad, hope filled week. It’s tough for me to restrain myself from writing way more than you wanna read about this special week in July.

My point today is that the ONLY way the volunteer counselors get through that incredible week is by working (and playing) together.

It is a beautiful thing to see. Just like a paceline.

BTW, “esperanza” is Spanish for “hope.”

Posted by: Don Linnen | 10 July 2007

Can’t We All Just Get Along?

Ever wonder what a paceline really is? It’s a great example of playing nice…when it works.

A typical paceline is a group of people in a hurry to get somewhere that follow in line right behind each other. Sounds kind of goofy if you remember playing follow the leader as a kid, especially when you thought it was really fun to stop all of a sudden when you were in front.

You ain’t seen goofy till you’ve seen some guys wearing dorky little helmets matching their garishly colored spandex and riding bicycles in a paceline. And when you see this, and understand it, you might revise your opinion of what goofy is.

The Tour de France began again on Saturday with 189 riders. A bunch of crazy guys have been riding this epic bike race across France since 1903. Le Tour and Versus offers us some quality visuals on working together…or not.

The strategy of the race is pretty simple. Survive and get to the finish line first.

The tactics aren’t much more complicated. Teams of nine guys ride in a line…a paceline. The first guy leads and the rest follow closely behind him using about 2/3 the effort. When the first guy gets tired, he rotates back, and someone else leads…starts pulling the team from the front.

These teams are sometimes closely choreographed and sometimes not. Most of the time the teams form a larger group or pack (the peleton) to fight the wind for the long haul. They’re still working together to save energy even though they’re competitors.

Sometimes a few impatient (or really ambitious) guys will break away from the pack. Those individuals will become their own ad hoc team (for a while) to work together to beat the pack. Most of the time, but not always, the larger group will catch and pass the smaller group just by working together.

Do ya get the theme here yet? This sharing the load – getting along – working together thing?

It is pretty neat and works amazingly well. Working together to go further and faster with less effort. Wow! What a concept.

So why don’t more people do it? Why don’t more nonprofits do it? Especially if their hearts beat to the plight of the same cause?

Posted by: Don Linnen | 5 July 2007

Who’s Running the Show?

Okay, boys and girls. Time for a quiz.

According to FP (that’s the catchy acronym for Foreign Policy magazine) how many nations still have monarchs as head of state?

A) 34

B) 44

C) 54

The answer is of course later in this post. In the meantime, here are some questions closer to home.

How many monarchs are running nonprofits? Optionally you can answer the following question:

Is your nonprofit being run by a monarch? Take your time. It’s an essay question.

The answer may be readily apparent, or it may need to develop while you’re on one of your long runs or standing under a hot shower. Wherever you do your best thinking and talking to yourself.

So what’s the answer to the question on rulers in those faraway lands?

According to FP, there are 44 countries that still have a monarch as head of state. They say that’s quite a bit fewer than last century, but it still seems like a lot to me. Of those 44, Queen Elizabeth reigns over 16 of them.

To put it in context, I went to my friendly spy service, the CIA World Factbook. They tell me there are 268 countries in the world. So just over 16% of the countries on this planet are ruled by some sort of potentate.

How many nonprofits being ruled by just one person? My gut tells me it is more than 16% of the total.

Is yours one of them?

Posted by: Don Linnen | 26 June 2007

You Want Fries With That Mission?

Monday’s Wall Street Journal had an interesting article about charities getting into the franchise business to raise some extra money. Profits on the Side told of some pretty amazing gains and some pretty big losses.

“Social franchising” is what they call it at Harvard Business School. Interesting is what I call it.

Good nonprofits need to be run like a good business. Different rules. Different motives. But you still owe it to everyone involved to run it efficiently and effectively.

To be competitive, you often need to think out of the box. Before you do that, remember to tend to the basics. That starts with your board.

If you’re serious about opening a franchise for your nonprofit, do you have someone on your board who already has franchise experience? More than just the smell of French fries on their clothes?

Posted by: Don Linnen | 24 June 2007

Help From The Vols

So you’ve got a bunch of volunteers showing up to “help” in a few weeks. What are they going to do? What are you going to do?

Which of those questions is more important?

If you just wait for them to arrive, hand ’em a bottle of water and a t-shirt, point them to the tools, and show them where to go to get started, you can get some pretty good stuff done.

Sometimes free labor is just worth what it costs.

You’re competing for volunteer time with other organizations who love to use volunteers. If the time is well spent, the vols will want to come back to you.

If you’re not ready to efficiently make the most of their time or if they feel like their contributions are minimal or just a band aid for what’s really needed, you may not see them again.

Depending upon your staffing, you might not always be able to prepare much in advance. You may not even have a process to hand off to a temporary volunteer coordinator. It is what it is.

That just means you spend more time recruiting new volunteers…re-inventing the wheel for your next lalapalooza. What are you going to do?

It’s your choice. Spend the time before the vols show up so that they make real progress, learn to love your mission, and want to come back as experienced volunteers (and recruiters), or spend the time recruiting the next batch of vols so you can throw something together and make things look good. For a while.

It’s your choice. What are you trying to accomplish?

O yeah. Did I mention that good volunteers often turn into good donors of things besides time?

Posted by: Don Linnen | 22 June 2007

Today’s Experts

The Wall Street Journal today says you can hire a consultant to help you name your baby. A friend of mine told me yesterday that a couple of years ago she worked part time as a consultant to individual families to help them get their high school kids into the “right” university.

If I stopped blogging right now and went for a run in my neighborhood, I’d pass at least three consultants, aka “nannies,” taking their charges out for a stroll. Ah….the wonders of “outsourcing.” Life in the 21st Century. Don’t cha just love it!

This isn’t a rant against it. I like to cook, but I often outsource our meals. I know where to go for some really good food ready to reheat and serve at home. The chefs at Whole Foods and Central Market are terrific! Those folks are experts at making good, healthy food.

There are lots of “experts” out there. An old joke is that an “x” is an unknown factor. A “spurt” is a drip of water under pressure. Therefore an “expert” is an unknown drip under pressure.

Experts are often called consultants. If they come from out of town, they’re more of an expert. Or not. They are unknown, but rarely are drips.

Through 20+ years of selling computer systems to large corporations, I mostly practiced consultive selling myself. Some things, especially complex things, are just not a quick sell.

Frankly, more than consulting, I probably did more coaching, advising, encouraging, and gathering of experts, technical wizards, and gurus to solve problems for my customers. I’ve always been a little suspicious of the consultant who is also the guru.

Business author Michael Treacy says that “there are way more gurus than there are new ideas.” There are new tools for the 21st Century, but basic, good ideas are centuries old.

If your organization is looking for a consultive guru, it might be wise to read “Bad Consultant Confidential” in the Chronicles of Philanthropy. If you’re a new nonprofit, I highly recommend a subscription to the Chron.

In a nutshell, the article says that good consultants can really help, but a bad choice can at a minimum lose you considerable time and money. It goes on to say that consultants need to thoroughly understand your organization. That means they’re either a really quick study or they have previous experience with organizations similar to your size and your mission.

You also need to be prepared for additional work if change is to truly be implemented. Change will probably not happen quickly. And it will only happen if you act. (I’ve coached one nonprofit that listens politely and smiles at my recommendations. Little action has yet to occur.)

Finally, if your income is weak, don’t count on magic bullets from a development guru to help you raise funds. There’s no speed dating in this game. Relationships with funders are everything. Good, solid relationships take time.

Now we’re back to one of those basics, a good ideas that is centuries old.

Posted by: Don Linnen | 19 June 2007

Social Venture Capital

venture |ˈven ch ər|
noun
a risky or daring journey or undertaking : pioneering ventures into little-known waters.
• a business enterprise involving considerable risk.

So whadayagit when you gather a hundred smart people willing to risk several thousand dollars and hundreds of hours every year to make a difference? The answer in North Texas is the Dallas Social Venture Partners (DSVP).

Just returned from an intro to DSVP in preparation for this year’s grant cycle. I’m impressed. This is venture capital at its best. The capital is not just their bucks, but their brains and hearts to assist nonprofits in capacity building.

By December, DSVP will select one or two nonprofits focusing on youth-at-risk and education issues and help those orgs start attaining some really big goals. The help comes from investments by the partners in the form of funding, and more significantly in the form of expertise…critical skill sets of every type that well run organizations in any business need to succeed.

What a concept! Increasing your joy to stuff ratio and working together to change the world.

This will be fun to watch. Sort of reminds me of a paceline.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories